The Nationalist Party (GMD) and the Guoshu movement of 1920s

10 Jan

Thus, it has been argued that the 1920’s ushered in a different political climate with an increasing nationalistic sentiment. It was in this decade that Dr. Sun Yat-Sen reorganized himself and established the Guomindang or “Nationalist Party” (國民黨). With nationalism also came renewed militarism; the Nationalist Party allied themselves with several local warlords in Guangdong province, sought organizational assistance from the Soviet Union and ultimately set up the Whampoa Military Academy (黃埔軍校). The appeal to nationalism was certainly explicit;

Today we are the poorest and weakest nation in the world and occupy the lowest position in international affairs. Other men are carving knives and serving dishes; we are fish and meat. Our position at this time is most perilous. If we do not earnestly espouse nationalism and weld together our four hundred million people into a strong nation, there is a danger of China being lost and our people being destroyed. If we wish to avert this catastrophe, we must espouse nationalism and bring this nationalist spirit to the salvation of the country.
(de Bary, pp. 106-107)


Zhang Zhi Dong had rejected all “old methods of training” and had no use for either spears or swords. Later, under Yuan Shi Kai, the Ministry of Education had issued the “Guidelines for Education” which embraced both the German style military drilling and incorporation of Chinese martial arts training. In the 1920’s, military men with close affiliations to traditional Chinese martial arts also rose to prominence just as increasing nationalist sentiment favored the promotion of their methods. Nationalists could argue that they were uniquely valuable because they were uniquely Chinese. (Lorge 213) At the same time, the outcome of the First World War undermined the reputation of the foreign, German style military drilling.

I don’t oppose playing ball in the least, but I do oppose this feverish consumption of foreigners’ goods. This is exercise, but it is the exercise of the gents and ladies of the leisured classes. If you want to exercise your body, is a blade not enough? Is a sword routine not enough? Are wrestling or boxing not enough? Of China’s eighteen types of martial arts, not one is incapable of drenching our entire bodies in sweat, stimulating all the body’s blood, tendons, and bones. … Now it is all just about blindly following the West, and when you think about it this is really our greatest national shame.
Feng Yu Xiang (馮玉祥)

Feng Yu Xiang (馮玉祥) had originally been part of Yuan Shi Kai’s Beiyang Army (北洋軍) but had changed affiliations several times before joining the Nationalist Party. Feng was probably unaware of the irony, but his statement was the exact inversion of Lu Xun’s response to Chen Tie Sheng;

I do not mind if some people think martial arts is a special skill and enjoy their own practice. This is not a big matter. However, I disagree with the propaganda of traditional Chinese martial arts because educators promote martial arts as a fashion, as if all Chinese people should do the exercise.
(New Youth, 15 February 1919)


In this new nationalistic point of view, there was nothing inherently “wrong” with Western exercise, but it was completely unnecessary for China. The Chinese had a long history of physical culture which had simply been obscured by those enamored with Western thought; “Ignorant students, their minds drunk with the spirit of Europe, still say that China has no Tiyu history of. Ah, how could they be so wrong?” (Morris 43) This included Chinese martial arts, which were equally “qualified to be part of Tiyu.” (Morris 43)


Of course, there was merit to this position as well. Historically, the Chinese had archery, the ancient football game of “Cu Ju” (蹴鞠), horse riding, wrestling and the lifting of stone weights. Relevant to our study, all had featured in military training and most had found their way into popular martial arts traditions. Some nationalists would take the argument a step farther; Chinese physical culture was unique and had unique benefits. Western calisthenics, Western weight lifting or Western boxing might build strong muscles; but Chinese martial arts were unique in their cultivation of Qi.

Surging nationalism also changed the terminology. As we have seen, through China’s history martial arts had been described with many terms. Beginning in the Ming Dynasty, and through most of the Qing as well, Quan (拳) was perhaps the most common term associated with its practice. But now Quan (拳) was easily confused with, in many circles flatly associated with, the failed “Boxers” of the Yi He Quan (義和拳). As we begin to see all things become associated with the nation-state, “National Painting” (國畫), “National Music” (國樂) and “National Medicine” (國醫), we also begin to see “martial arts” become “National Arts” or “Guoshou” (國術). Of course, a “National Art” also implies patriotism, loyalty to the state, as opposed to the various other loyalties and affiliations martial artists traditionally had.

On March 12, 1925 Sun Yat-Sen died of liver cancer at the age of 58, making way for the rise of his protégé Chiang Kai Shek (蔣介石). Chiang came from a wealthy family of salt merchants and had been raised with orthodox Confucian values. He attended the Baoding Military Academy (保定軍校) in 1906, and then went to Japan to continue his training. He served in the Imperial Japanese Army from 1909 to 1911. He returned to China in 1911 to participate in the events surrounding the collapse of the Qing Dynasty.


It was in Japan that Chiang met the aforementioned Chen Qi Mei (陳其美). Chen mentored Chiang, and initiated him into the Tong Meng Hui (同盟會) in while they were in Japan in 1908. Upon returning to China, Chen placed Chiang in charge of the 83rd Brigade, a group which at best has been described as “riff-raff.” (T’ang pp 252-253) These were also the years in which Chiang associated with Shanghai’s notorious Green Gang (青帮). (T’ang pp 252-253 and Berkov 29) In 1912 Chiang was involved in the assassination of Tao Cheng Zhang (陶成章), a political rival of both Sun Yat Sen and Chen Qi Mei. (Loh p 27). In 1915, he was also personally involved in the assassination of the Shanghai garrison commander. (Loh 29) In fact, the Shanghai International Settlement police charged Chiang with a number of felonies for which he never stood trial. (Loh 20, 133) Following Chen Qi Mei’s assassination by agents of Yuan Shi Kai, Chiang joined Sun Yat Sen in Guangdong in 1918.

Between 1926 and 1928, the Nationalist Party under the direction of Chiang Kai Shek engaged in the Northern Expedition (國民革命軍北伐). Utilizing a modernized force trained at the Whampoa Military Academy, the Nationalist Party engaged in a campaign to oust what they considered the illegitimate Beiyang government (北洋政府) in Beijing, end the “Warlord Era” and reunify the nation. Much of the reunification was achieved through creating alliances and incorporating these so called “warlords” into the Nationalist Party. However, when fighting was necessary, the Nationalist forces had been trained in modern methods with Soviet assistance, were armed with Russian and German weaponry, and had a propaganda wing aided by the Chinese communists who had joined with the Nationalist Party under the “First United Front.” It was a formidable military force, and as former commandant of the academy Chiang had the personal loyalty of most of the officers.

Communists executed in streets of Shanghai

Communists executed in streets of Shanghai

On April 12, 1927 Chiang began his quest for undisputed control of the Nationalist Party and initiated the “White Massacre” or “April 12 Purge” (四一二清黨) in Shanghai. Communist military units, radical union members, plain-clothes Communist organizers and left leaning intellectuals were all targeted. Thousands of workers were shot or beheaded on the spot. (Hahn p 111) Chiang for the most part did not use his regular military, he relied upon his connections with the notorious Green Gang and also recruited Red Gang (紅帮) enforcers, the “red staff” (紅棍). The massacre was followed by a party purge that ousted all Communists and leftists, leaving Chiang as leader of a right-leaning party that established itself in Nanjing.

Within a year of consolidating his power, the Guomindang turned its attention toward the regulation of martial arts. As a military man, who had trained in Japan, it was not surprising that Chiang Kai-Shek had already long embraced the martial arts as a tool to strengthen the nation;

There are certain arts and technical abilities a modern Chinese citizen should be conversant with. We must encourage certain arts among which the following is most important: Chinese boxing. Chinese boxing in not simply a form of physical contest; it is also pregnant with meaning for the physical education or our citizens. Its highest ideal is to enable the learner to remain calm and serene, to coordinate his mind and muscles, and to strike home with the full force of both. Such an attitude is somewhat different from the basic assumptions of Western type boxing. We call our type the “Chinese National Boxing (Guoshou),” because we wish to emphasize its significance for the physical and mental health of our citizens. In all our future educational plans, we must regard Chinese boxing as an essential item in the physical education of our citizens and encourage people to learn it with all the persuasion and authority we can command.
(Kennedy Jing Wu P20)

While many of the men behind the scenes of the Jing Wu were important political figures, the organization attempted to maintain the appearance it was apolitical. The second article of the Jing Wu constitution declared that members “were not allowed to become involved in politics.” (Morris p. 197) Chen Tie Sheng famously declared that the Jing Wu “does not carry the stench of politics.” (Morris 198). Reading more detailed histories of the Jing Wu, a reader might be tempted to dismiss their claims as absurd or self-serving, but it may have been simply a necessary function of the 1910s period. The 1920’s were a time of great political change, and Chiang Kai Shek had overtly political designs in regards to the martial arts.

Chiang Kai Shek was perhaps uniquely qualified to understand the challenges presented by the existing martial arts community. He was a military man who had spent considerable time in Shanghai with secret society members and undoubtedly with the martial artists who associated with them. Consider Doak Barnett, a well-known historian who documented conditions in Sichuan province during the Republican period. He reported what Chiang Kai Shek had surely already long known;

There was nothing secret about [secret societies]…. The fact that it is outlawed by the central government does not seem to bother anyone concerned, or, it might be added, deter anyone from becoming a member if he is invited.

The Qing Dynasty had collapsed but very little had really changed. The practice of martial arts produced skilled fighters who frequently had loyalties only to their teacher and tradition. They were available as muscle-to-hire to criminals, secret societies and potential revolutionaries. Chiang had used precisely these sorts of men during the “White Massacre” in Shanghai. The communists had also tried to incorporate and mobilize them.


Furthermore, upon closer inspection, the wave of progressivism we have described thus far really represented a very select few. The Jing Wu Association in Shanghai, Sun Lu Tang’s Beiping Physical Culture Research Institute (北平體育研究) in Beijing and Li Cun Yi’s Chinese Warrior Association (中華武士會) in Tianjin were the exceptions, certainly not the rule. Wu Zhi Qing (吳志青) was the leader of the “Chinese Martial Hero Association of Shanghai” (上海中華武俠會) during the 1920’s. In discussing the community, Wu pointed out that martial arts were still not openly discussed and factions still sought to keep their skills secret. (Morris p. 217) Martial artists still functioned largely as their own sub-culture, felt little connection or loyalty to the nation-state, and had the power to resist. Thus, they continued to represent a significant challenge to anyone wishing to establish central authority. (Lorge p. 216)

Another “rough cut”: New Culture Movement criticisms

2 Jan

Chen Du Xiu took to the pages of his “New Youth” journal to criticize the new martial arts program of General Ma Liang (馬良). The general’s “New Chinese Martial Arts” (中華新武術) provides us with an excellent example of this new approach to martial arts practice emerging within the military. Ma Liang had been a product of the new army and its German tradition military drilling, but he was also a strong nationalist and defender of Chinese martial arts. His new training program claimed to have incorporated Western ideas and western callisthenic exercises for physical conditioning, along with Chinese fist/striking (拳), leg/kicking (腿), wrestling (摔角), sword and staff fighting methods which were said to have been “scientifically selected” from the many different traditions. In 1917 Ma Liang’s program was introduced as mandatory training for military, police and physical education training at Beijing Normal University. (Gu “Shilun beiyang junfa tongzhi shiqi de tiyu.” [Sport warlord rule In North China]. In Xin Zhongguo tiyu shi youxiu lunwenji, ed. Liuji, pp. 308-316)


In some regards, Ma Liang’s “New Chinese Martial Arts” might seem rather progressive, even similar to the Jing Wu’s attempts to take the martial arts and rationalize them and make them relevant. Yet Chen Du Xiu’s article in “New Youth” demonstrated he was violently opposed;

We have already had enough of the 1900 “Spirit Boxers”, but now we are supposed to teach Commander Ma’s martial arts in school. Do not once more allow the “extraordinary feats of strength, chaos and spirits”, of which even Confucius did not speak [because of their supernatural content], to come and “deceive the next generation”.
(Morris, 2004, p. 194)


Chen Du Xiu was quick to link what was advertised as a new martial arts program to the disastrous Boxer Uprising. Did Chen really believe this, or was it simply a useful tactic and his opposition really rooted in his ideological anti-traditionalism and anti-militarism? It is impossible to say, but we see the same attitude expressed by the most famous figure to emerge from the New Culture Movement, Lu Xun (魯迅). The following comments by Lu Xun also appeared in the “New Youth” journal;

Recently, there have been a fair number of people scattered about who have been energetically promoting [martial arts]. (note on “quan”) I seem to recall this having happened once before. But at that time the promoters were the Manchu court and high officials, whereas now they are Republican educators – people occupying a quite different place in society. I have no way of telling, as an outsider, whether their goals are the same or different.
(Cohen 230)


Clearly, Lu Xun was comparing the supporters of the new martial arts programs with the reactionary Qing clique which had sanctioned the Yi He Quan.

These educators have now renamed the old methods “that the Goddess of the Ninth Heaven transmitted to the Yellow Emperor”…”the new martial arts” or “Chinese-style gymnastics” and they make young people practice them.

If one were to believe Lu Xun, those promoting the new programs were only attempting to use new terminology to obscure and confuse. That in fact there was no difference between their approach to martial arts training and the highly ritualized, superstitious practices of the Yi He Quan? The tone of his statements is increasingly satirical and sarcastic.

I’ve heard there are a lot of benefits to be had from them. Two of the more important may be listed here:

(1) They have a physical education function. It’s said that when Chinese take instruction in foreign gymnastics it isn’t effective; the only thing that works for them is native-style gymnastics (that is, [martial arts]). I would have thought that if one spread one’s arms and legs apart and picked up a foreign bronze hammer or wooden club in one’s hands, it ought probably to have some “efficacy” as far as one’s muscular development was concerned. But it turns out this isn’t so! Naturally, therefore, the only course left to them is to switch to learning such tricks as “Wu Song disengaging himself from his manacles.” No doubt this is because Chinese are different from foreigners physiologically.

(2) They have a military function. The Chinese know how to box; the foreigners don’t know how to box. So if one day the two meet and start fighting it goes without saying the Chinese will win…. The only thing is that nowadays people always use firearms when they fight. Although China “had firearms too in ancient times” it doesn’t have them anymore. So if the Chinese don’t learn the military art of using rattan shields, how can they protect themselves against firearms? I think–since they don’t elaborate on this, this reflects “my own very limited and shallow understanding”–I think that if they keep at it with their boxing they are bound to reach a point where they become “invulnerable to firearms.” (I presume by doing exercises to benefit their internal organs?) Boxing was tried once before–in 1900. Unfortunately on that occasion its reputation may be considered to have suffered a decisive setback. We’ll see how it fares this time around.
(Cohen, History in Three Keys p 231)


If Lu Xun’s condescending tone suggested that he believed all those advocating the practice of martial arts were ignorant, semi-literate peasants, he miscalculated. “New Youth” subsequently published a rebuttal by none other than Chen Tie Sheng (陳鐵生), the leading writer and editor of the Jing Wu’s publications. (Kennedy jingwu 24) Chen’s rebuttal was equally satirical and sarcastic, while exposing Lu Xun’s relative ignorance of subject matter. (note on sources)

Chen Tie Sheng begins by addressing the very essence of the issue, asking how Lu Xun could possibly confuse the “Boxer Bandits” (拳匪), the Yi He Quan, with the legitimate practice of martial arts (技擊術)? Chen states that Lu Xun couldn’t possibly have had any direct experience with the Yi He Quan, or he could never be so confused. “Boxer Bandits” (拳匪) engaged in “bestial dances” (禽獸舞) (i.e. spirit possession) and relied upon “sorcery” (鬼道主義 ). Authentic martial artists were associated by contrast with what Chen referred to as “humanism” (人道主義), a rejection of the supernatural. Chen’s argument is the same one Joseph Esherick would painstakingly document seventy years later.

Chen’s attacks continued to suggest that Lu Xun was an conceited outsider who knew very little about the things he criticized. Chen countered Lu Xun’s “gun argument” by stating matter-of-factly that “firearms must indeed by used” (槍砲固然要用), but also noting that the military drilling in middle schools included sword and spear practice. Furthermore, real combat included “in close fighting” but that “this doubtless is not something Mr. Lu knows about.” (Cohen 232) Finally, demonstrating that he had just as much education and wit to spar with the literary great, Chen sarcastically called Lu Xun himself a “Boxer Bandit” in that, like the Yi He Quan, he had no real comprehension of what constituted authentic Chinese martial arts at all. (ibid)


Of course, “Quan” (拳) was a term long associated with the practice of martial arts and has generally been translated in English sources as “boxing.” In this volume I consciously avoided using the term “boxing” so as to not confuse the orthodox practice of martial arts with the so-called “Boxers” of the Yi He Quan (義和拳). In Chen’s rebuttal, he uses “Boxer Bandits”, a term which had been widely used to describe the Yi He Quan, but in doing so demonstrates how “Quan” (拳) had come to be linked with the notorious character for “bandit” (匪). Furthermore, Chen uses the more classical “技擊術” in describing legitimate martial arts practice. Perhaps it was this tainting of the term “Quan” (拳) that prompted a search for new terminologies, such as Guoshu (國術).

Another rough cut; changes in attitudes towards fighting in CMA

19 Dec

“In ancient times martial arts were used to kill people, while today they are used to educate people.”
– Fan Jun, “Thoughts and words in martial arts” (1918)
(Morris 188)

The Jing Wu was at the forefront of the movement to gain public acceptance of the Chinese martial arts as a legitimate form of physical education. It was also the foremost defender against the criticisms leveled by fellow New Culture Movement progressives. But it would be mistaken to think that the Jing Wu’s new approach to martial arts included either a denigration or dismissal of its practical application. The Jing Wu also offered military training courses designed to update martial arts training methods and produce a nation of citizen-soldiers. (Kennedy JingWu 90 – 101). Among these military training courses was the strongly Japanese influenced “Pi Ci” or “Chop and Slice” (劈刺) program of bayonet and short sword training.


Yet, there remains no question that the idea that martial arts no longer had practical fighting application and is best thought of solely as physical education originates in this period. Many cite Sun Lu Tang, a prolific author and successful teacher who was later in life an exponent of the idea of martial arts for health maintenance and self-cultivation. In fact, Sun is reported to have said that those interested in fighting should just “get a gun.” (A Study of Taijiquan, Cartmel translation)

The idea that the introduction of firearms made martial arts training irrelevant to practical fighting in the early 20th century is a popular idea, but it doesn’t stand up to closer scrutiny. To be sure, the ignorant and poorly trained (perhaps, if you remember earlier, not trained at all) peasants of the Yi He Quan were slaughtered by foreign bullets. But firearms had been part of Chinese military tactics for a considerable time period during which active soldiers had remained very interested and involved in martial arts training. Certainly, the military men in Chiang Kai Shek’s Nationalist regime remained active in martial arts training. The communist Red Army also demonstrated interest in the practical application of martial arts training for close quarters combat, giving birth in the late 1950’s to the beginnings of modern Sanshou/San Da.


In response to the “gun argument”, Peter Lorge suggests that at the local level, outside major cities, firearms were still rare and thus martial arts training remained relevant to violent conflicts. (Lorge 218) Even this misses much of the truth of the matter. Even in large cities, traditional martial arts training remained relevant to close quarters combat. In Shanghai, the notorious Green Gang (青帮) had a close relationship with at least one martial arts sect, Shaolin Luo Han Men (少林羅漢門). One of the body guards of gang leader Du Yue Sheng (杜月生), “Big-Eared Du”, was a martial artist from this school by the name of Wu (吳). William E. Fairbairn’s “all in fighting” was strongly influenced not only by his Judo training, but by a twenty-year career in the Shanghai Municipal Police (SMP) beginning in 1907. Fairbairn served in the city’s “red light district” where he not only observed but also was involved in hundreds of close quarter fights.


Returning to Sun Lu Tang, closer inspection reveals that as a young man his training was very practical in nature and he took an active interest in testing his skills. He is said to have engage in a number of challenge matches and worked for a time as one of the “four staff”, as a bodyguard. Sun himself explained how upon meeting Cheng Ting Hua, he was actively encouraged to go out and test his skills for real. (Sun 1915) What accounted for Sun’s apparent change of heart later in life? Sun had already early in his career been exposed to a more holistic approach by his Shaolin teacher, a man who also certainly had practical fighting experience. Yet as Ben Judkins astutely noted, it would be foolish to discount Sun’s personal experiences during the Boxer Uprising; witnessing the utter destruction of Baoding and Beijing and the murder of his teacher and friend Cheng Ting Hua. How much of the turn away from fighting had to do with personal experience rather than new technology is hard to say, but certainly merits consideration.

More rough cuts from Kung Fu History Book

17 Dec

[Another rough cut from my forthcoming book on Chinese martial arts history, an outline stretching from the Waring States period to the Republic]

Several writers have called the Boxer Uprising a national embarrassment, but the consequences were far worse than anything that term could ever describe. The Yi He Quan’s violence resulted in indiscriminate retaliation by the foreign powers. The occupation of the capital allowed not only the foreign troops, but foreign nationals including missionaries, to engage in what one American correspondent called “the biggest looting excursion since the days of Pizarro.” It is said that in order to avoid being raped, thousands of Chinese women committed suicide by throwing themselves down wells. The American commander, Adna R. Chaffee said “It is safe to say that where one real Boxer has been killed, 50 harmless coolies or laborers, including not a few women and children have been slain.” The “Boxer Protocol” that the Qing government agreed to sign on September 7, 1901 had even more damaging long term consequences; foreign powers could now permanently station troops in the capital and China agreed to pay a crippling reparation of more than $330 million.


While the Spirit Boxers who served as the foundation of the Yi He Quan movement had at best been peripheral to the mainstream martial arts community, we know that many martial artists eventually became swept up in the uprising. Once the imperial court sanctioned the Yi He Quan, it clearly emboldened some legitimate martial artists to participate. Xing Yi Quan teacher Li Cunyi (李存義) joined the Yi He Quan in Beijing in 1900 to fight the foreign armies, and Mei Hua Quan teacher Zhao San-duo (趙三多) would reappear briefly in Guan country, Shandong province. Others were effected unwillingly; Sun Lu Tang (孫祿堂) was forced to relocate his family out of Beijing, and Cheng Ting Hua (程廷華) was actually shot and killed by German soldiers.

Those that survived the primary violence still had to fear retribution. As Adna R. Chaffee’s quote above suggests, the foreign powers executed anyone they even suspected of being a “boxer.” Furthermore, foreign retribution was not all they had to fear. The Chinese people were not just humiliated by the Boxer Uprising, they were angry. Much of that anger was directed at the martial arts community, which they viewed as the ignorant peasants who had incurred the wrath of the foreign powers, relying on superstitious nonsense that had been less than useless against western firearms. In the immediate aftermath, martial artists across the country were forced underground.


There is another dimension to this anger that I think is often neglected. Despite common perceptions that by this point the Qing Dynasty was already in decline, there had indeed been progressives within the government. In 1898, these progressives had initiated the “Hundred Days of Reform” (戊戌變法) in an attempt to reform and modernize. Their reactionary opponents, the leaders of the coup that ended those reforms, had also been the same faction that had allied themselves with and sanctioned the Yi He Quan. Thus, another legacy of the Boxer Uprising was that in the mind of progressives, the martial arts community was forever linked with the short sighted reactionaries who had blocked reform, failed to maintain the nation’s strength and provoked the foreign retaliation. Martial arts practice ended up on the wrong side of a growing intellectual movement.

It is often difficult to identify a specific date as the beginning of an intellectual movement, and just as hard to create a label that truly does it justice. The Self-Strengthening Movement (自強運動) of 1861 to 1895 represented the first turn towards the west for knowledge, at least technical knowledge. However, it remained a relatively conservative approach. When we speak of the New Culture Movement (新文化運動), we are not simply speaking of the advocacy of western learning, but also a disillusionment with and ultimately a rejection of traditional Chinese culture. A classic example of this thinking was the writer Lu Xun (魯迅). His “Diary of a Madman” implied that China’s traditional culture was cannibalistic, and “The True Story of Ah Q” showed the typical Chinese as weak and self-deceiving. The full-fledged New Culture Movement emerged as a call for the creation of an entirely new Chinese culture based upon global (i.e. western) standards, especially a dedication to science, rationalism and political democracy.


The movement had its foundations in the 1890’s, with increased contact with foreigners and the appearance of translations of western publications. Thus, in some respects we can also view the Boxer Uprising as a reactionary response to the same trends which were producing the New Culture Movement. After the uprising, the New Culture Movement identified the Yi He Quan, and by extension all martial arts practice, as emblematic of everything that was objectionable in the old culture and of the reasons why the people of China had become weak. If the Yi He Quan were an indication, then martial artists must be “backward” and “superstitious.” (Cohen xii) In his 1915 book, Sun Lu Tang hinted at these biases, saying “There was a prejudice in the old days that literates despised martial arts as martial artists were short on learning.” (Dan Miller’s translation)

The government briefly suppressed the practice of martial arts following the Boxer Uprising, closing private academies (武館) in the capital in particular. In 1905, another movement towards reform resulted in the abolition of the military examination system. Those martial artists who had prepared candidates for the exams, as well as those who had viewed martial arts training as preparation for a military career, faced a new reality. For almost a decade, the practice of martial arts seems to have sat on the edge of extinction. The real challenge remained the fact that in this new intellectual environment, martial art training was not simply unfashionable (it had always somewhat been) but was now identified as a symptom of the same feudal culture which had doomed the nation to failure and humiliation.


Of course, martial arts practice did not suffer extinction. Around the country, they reemerged in the mid-1910s along with the establishment of several organizations that today’s practitioners are familiar with; the preeminent of which is the “Pure Martial Athletic Association (精武體育會 Jing Wu Tiyu Hui). We must not only ask “how” this happened, we must ask “why?” It was at this point that martial arts practice most fundamentally changed. Prior to the turn of the century, martial arts practice had either been conducted by active military men or in villages where, in addition to providing training for their militia, it was a recreation for children and for adults during times when they were not engaged in agricultural labor. (Kennedy Jingwu p1). In this new period, martial arts practice becomes an urban activity engaged in by the middle class; for health, physical education and recreation.

Among those who contributed to the introduction of Western thought into Chinese society was Yan Fu (嚴復1854-1921), a scholar and translator whose translation of Thomas Huxley’s Evolution and Ethics (in Chinese 天演論) brought Social Darwinism to the forefront of Chinese intellectual discussion. In some circles it has been argued that Yan Fu deliberately ignored the ethical dimensions of Huxley’s original work to advance the political agendas of national competitiveness and physical self-strengthening. Yan Fu stated that “The power of a nation is based on people’s physical strength.” (Lu Zhouxiang p.484) His work made familiar the concept of “survival of the fittest” (in Chinese天擇).

It was Social Darwinism and “survival of the fittest” which prompted an interest in Western models of physical education (Ti Cao體操) and military drilling (Bing Cao兵操). The rational was that the nation was week because the population was physically weak. The poor suffered from poor diet, disease, and crowded living conditions. Xu Yi Bing (徐一冰), a pioneering educator who opened the “Chinese Calisthenics School” (中國體操學校) in Shanghai in 1909, believed much of China’s contemporary problems were a result of its lack of attention to physical education;

The people of our nation are weary and spiritless, our bodies emaciated by disease. We trudge on towards death, and if we bother to find why, we see that it is nothing else but the harm of our abandonment of [physical education].
(Marrow of nation P 2)

On the other hand, the educated had been raised in Confucian society which held deeply rooted prejudices about what the “proper man” looked like physically. He was pale skinned, thin, almost emaciated. This aesthetic reflected the many hours a Confucian scholar spent studying books and writing calligraphy. Also, musculature was viewed as an indication that the person engaged in manual labor. (Kennedy and Guo Jingwu 54-55) Chinese society lacked the modern, Western concept of public health and as a result had failed to properly evolve into a modern nation state.


To strengthen the nation and resist Western imperialism, physical education (體操) would produce a new generation of able bodied men with “martial spirit” developed by military drilling (兵操). Thus physical education and military training were perceived as over­lapping activities. It was, as Andrew Morris described it, a “militarized” physical education movement in which the Chinese initially looked to the German and Swedish models as opposed to the “sport”, fun and entertainment approaches of the Anglo-American model. As early as 1902, schools began to incorporate these “Ti Cao” calisthenics and gymnastics classes with “martial spirit” as their main goal. Beginning in 1904, private institutions focused on modern physical education also began to appear in major Chinese cities.

Thus, as much as the introduction of Western ideas produced a new manner of criticism of the martial arts, it also introduced a new context in which the martial arts might justify and legitimate themselves. Military-style calisthenics in the 1910s included some aspects of traditional martial arts, the famous novelist Mao Dun (茅盾) remembered practicing spear drills in middle school. (“My Life” p 72) Yet Western boxing and fencing were more universally practiced and respected. Even more telling, some physical education proponents also embraced Japanese Judo, seeing in it a martial art with traditional Japanese origins successfully converted to the standards of a modern international sport. (Marrow p 6) Martial arts would be acceptable only if they could demonstrate that they had been modernized and could serve as a proper form of physical education.

More Monkey Business

9 Dec

PLEASE NOTE: This is part two. Don’t read this unless you already read Monkey (Kung Fu) Business

Federation recognition, ranking and “cool technique” isn’t probably going to help anyone business-wise in today’s world. Things have changed not only because of the UFC and Mixed Martial Arts (MMA). We no longer have “kung fu movies” like Shaw brothers. We no longer have Chuck Norris martial arts themed movies. People are no longer raised believing that earning a black belt in martial arts is going to give them access to something special. There is very little “Asian mysticism” left. Many instructors of the past just got away with things based upon that stuff alone. No deal in today’s market.


A lot of martial artists have also not kept up with technology. In fact, I know some that still ask about the “yellow pages”! Many think FACEBOOK is beneath them. Don’t even get me started with web sites!!! A major problem, related to the previous; today people are more likely to enter search terms such as kickboxing, Muay Thai, MMA, boxing and jiujitsu.


So, I’d argue that one of the most valuable things that any martial arts organization could offer would be practical business advice. Yet I don’t know of a single one that does! I even know a few that were offered some excellent assistance and dismissed it with contempt? To paraphrase the very successful Jon Taffer, they need to get out of the way of their own success.


I hope you are starting to see what I am getting at here. I’ve discussed it before… And I’ll return next to my favorite subject; FIGHTING.

Monkey (Kung Fu) Business….

9 Dec

I write about a variety to subjects here, but almost all of them are controversial in some way. I also don’t have much of a “filter”. My belief system, which I often refer to as the “pillars of truth”, doesn’t lend itself to that sort of thing. I believe that you serve people best by telling them the truth; even the ugly, unpleasant, inconvenient truth. So people with delicate constitutions, thin skins and false ideas of “martial virtue” frequently dislike me. As you might have guessed, I simply don’t care about that sort of thing very much.


Over the years, I’ve belonged to a number of organizations, associations and federations. In fact, I’ve even been part of the leadership of a few and maybe you could even say I have created a few. If you are a martial artist, chance are you’ve belonged to a few as well. So, ask yourself, WHY did you join those groups?


Like a lot of martial artists, I joined at least a few organizations for what might be loosely termed “recognition”. Not even necessarily “rank”, thought there are tons that do that as well. Some are cons that simply sell rank. Many legitimately serve to issue rank, with good intentions. Virtually all groups issue recognition in the form of certificates of membership and such.


But does any of that stuff, certificates, membership, rank, etc etc really benefit those who join? There might have been a time when a prospective student in the martial arts chose one school because the “master” was an 8th degree black belt and the “other guy” was “just” 6th degree. Today, I’m not really sure any of that stuff matters.


I know organizations that exist to give out rank outlines, rank requirements and, honestly, “cool stuff to teach”. Many instructors believe if they have more to teach, better stuff to teach, “cooler stuff” to teach, or manybe even “secret stuff” to teach that will translate into more students. Most of the martial arts industry is built upon ideas of rank outlines, rank requirements, belts and tests. Yet, again, I really have to tell you that in today’s world I am not sure any of that matters at all either. In fact, the more material you have the HARDER it might be to function as a business!

I’m just getting started, MUCH MORE to come in the next few days…..

Snakes! Sons of vipers! How will you escape the judgment of hell?

7 Dec

The Chinese martial arts community is often compared to crabs in a barrel; the analogy being that members of the community will attempt to negate or diminish the importance of any member who achieves success beyond the others, out of envy, spite, or competitive feelings, to halt their progress. Having just returned recently from a relevant sermon at my church, I rather like the following quote;

“Snakes! Sons of vipers! How will you escape the judgment of hell?”
– John the Baptist

When it comes to martial arts, we aren’t simply talking about business competition. People come to martial arts instructors to help them, they put a lot of trust in them. A dishonest martial arts instructor can not only steal people’s money, they can ruin their lives, destroy their confidence and teach them things that can physically harm them. Martial arts, like some other similar communities, has its fair share of cults. So I personally have no qualms about calling out frauds and con men. It is an admittedly unpopular position in our community; it’s “rude”, it’s “aggressive”, it’s against “we de” (martial virtue)… No, actually that’s all crap. If someone is a fraud or a con man there is nothing to defend.


My teacher, the late Chan Tai-San, certainly has a number of legitimate representatives. I am friendly with many, perhaps even most. The ones I am not particularly friendly with, I certainly have no problem giving them their proper due. That is never the issue. But if you expect me to not call out someone selling made up crap as the material my teacher taught you have a serious problem.


Make no mistake, I know as much about Chan Tai-San and his method as anyone, and significantly more than most. I spent decades with him, virtually every day, traveled with him, taught his public classes and translated for him. I confess, it amuses when people who were never there are suddenly experts on the subject. There are students or students of students who think they know something, THEY DO NOT.

Chan Tai-San's public class from early 1990's

Chan Tai-San’s public class from early 1990’s

Please feel free to learn more about me and my products by visiting me at

A day for perspectives

24 Nov

Something about holidays, perhaps the quiet time it provides me, always makes me ponder where I’ve been and where I am going. I know at times it comes across as if I have always had some master plan, but the reality is that it has just come together over time, and time and distance provide perspective. Still, I think it is a pretty good story.


I started practicing martial arts after I had been sick. I had been diagnosed with Leukemia at age six. Half the children died back then, and I spent more than a year in the hospital. I missed a year of school and had to be home tutored. I hadn’t learned to play sports, I was very sick, I even had permanent nerve damage in my legs. So martial arts didn’t just help me rebuild my health and my body, it was everything for me. All my friends and all my world revolved around it.

red belt

I was extremely lucky from day one, I got quality instruction under a very qualified instructor even though initially I knew nothing about martial arts other than a few Bruce Lee movies I had seen that had peaked my interest. Today I laugh at myself, thinking about how as a kid I was sure my “master” was some old, wise secret man. I now realize he was younger then than I am now! Perspective, and irony.


I distinctly remember a few things about my early training; I asked a lot of questions, wasn’t afraid to “buck the system” and wasn’t always satisfied with the answers. The third thing I had been taught in my school was a knife hand blow to the neck. The very first thing I did the first time they had me spar was to use that knife hand blow to the neck. They stopped the entire class because of that!


To his credit, my instructor, the late Pong Ki Kim, was always willing to entertain my questions and at least attempt to provide me answers. But many of those answers left me wondering, and I continued to look for answers. I found old books on the Moo Duk Kwan my teacher had actually done. I wanted to learn more martial arts methods. In retrospect, I was always interested in the practical applications of martial arts.


When I met Chan Tai-San, I still thought there were “secrets” that could be gotten if I found the right teacher and he accepted me. 16 years with Chan Tai-San, formal “baai si” adoption, and acting as his translator and constant companion during his travel I indeed learned some “secrets”. They were not the secrets I thought I would learn.

PAL 12152007 (3)

About 5 or 6 years into my martial arts teaching career, I was exposed to the first three UFC events. I had already been interested in practical application and full contact training, but this new “no hold barred” (NHB) motivated me in a particular way. It began what ultimately was a 20-year adventure into learning what worked, how it worked and how you trained it.


While it initially may appear a contradiction, these days I am focused more on teaching martial arts for fitness. It was a transition that began in 2010 and now I really have very little interest in training people to fight. There are a lot of reasons for this, but at the core is the simple fact that I have been there and done that, and have nothing more to prove.


On the other hand, in the past six years or so I have had the immense pleasure of helping people be healthier, feel better about themselves and live better lives. Considering I started martial arts because I was a sick child, this really should not come as a surprise. Of course, being who I am, it is incredibly important to me that even though most of my students are not interested in fighting, they are still learning martial arts correctly. THAT is the real issue. I am a strong advocate of “Truth” and martial arts must always be practiced with truth.

Baai Si 2

At the same time, while I am not that interested in “fighters” anymore I am still very interested in explaining the connection between traditional martial arts and practical application. So I have refocused my efforts into showing people HOW I got to where I am today, and my “secret group” provides people with detailed demonstrations of how I went from “traditional kung fu” to producing so many champions in Muay Thai, San Da, Boxing, Kickboxing and Mixed Martial Arts. If you are interested in the “secret group” email me at


I can’t say that life has always been easy, but it’s been a great life, with great experiences. And I look forward to the next years that are coming

Martial Business: Training fighters is NOT a business model

2 Nov


I began training fighters in 1994. The last time I had a fighter in an event was by coincidence (not design) 2015. That’s 21 years, where I trained hundreds of fighters, amateur and professional, who did very well in a variety of formats. But, as you might have guessed, I have been going to events less and less and honestly, I am not all that interested in training fighters anymore.


We were dominate in sanshou and san da, and a major presence in both Muay Thai and Mixed Martial Arts (MMA). I frequently had 5, 6, 10 different fighters in an event or on a card. We were very well known. A lot of people think that stuff like that is going to get them students. Oh, I definitely had people show up at my door because of all these events. They were always people that wanted to become “fighters”. First problem, a lot of people who THINK they want to be “fighters” have no idea what that means. Most are not prepared for all the hard work. Most are not prepared for the pain, the sweat and the blood. Most will never make it to their first fight.


Second problem, pretty much everyone who shows up at your door and tells you they want to be “fighters” will not be able to pay your regular tuition. It is the nature of the beast. Well! You say to yourself, “when they go professional I’ll make money that way”. Give me a minute to stop laughing…. Most fighters will never become professionals. Those that can become professional, won’t likely be ready for that level for maybe two years. And, finally, when they go professional, you know what you make? Yes, you make a whole 33%….. That is 1/3 of the $200 or $300 that most promotions will pay them…..

PAL 12152007 (3)

So, go back to an earlier observation I made; all those fights you win at local events are NOT likely to bring in many regular people who want to take classes regularly and will pay you regularly. Now I am going to give you the third piece of bad news…. The average “fighter” is also going to scare away a lot of those regular people….


If you are lucky, your “fighters” won’t pick on the regulars, and they won’t injure them. But fighters hang around your gym at all hours, they sweat a lot and make the place stink, they also tend to have bad personal hygiene. The don’t wash their workout clothing, their gear stinks, they leave their gear all around the gym. This is the sort of stuff that grosses out women, some of the most reliable clients a gym can have.


Fighters also often bring with them “drama”. Imagine if you will the sort of person who decides that their “career” is going to be beating people up (and getting beaten up). Fighters are also notorious for their lack of loyalty. You’ll invest a lot of time training them, get them ready for a title or to be professional, and they will think you’re too controlling or holding them back or the grass is greener in some other gym.


None of this has yet to account for the weekends you either close your gym or are not around to do sales because you are at a fight. It doesn’t account for the money you pay for a rental car, a night in a hotel, food, etc. And never forget, time really is money. So how much time are you spending with people who aren’t really making you money and MIGHT be obstacles to attracting and retaining the people who DO pay you money?


All of which is to say; training fighters may be a lot of things, but it is NOT a business model

Chinese martial arts the “old way”

28 Oct

Last weekend I took some of my more senior students to another state to attend a seminar by a well respected Chinese martial arts teacher. Some people find this unusual, since many instructors try to isolate their students and keep them from seeing other teachers and approaches. But as I have said many times in the past, I have never had an issue with it; I am trying to educate my students and I have always found that training with quality instructors reinforces what I have already taught them and they actually appreciate me MORE.

Chan Tai San inside grip

The seminar would always begin with form, something that initially my students were not accustomed to. That is, until they realized it was just practicing a technique in isolation, just as we do shadowing or warming up. Then the real “meat” would begin, after every form practice people would partner up and begin drilling. THIS is how I learned. THIS is how all Chinese martial arts used to be practiced. But, sadly, today it seemed so rare. It was partly why I brought my students, to see it up close and personal.


The forms and the initial drills were not to confine the practice, they were just the launching point for practice. The more we practiced, the move variations there were to do, the more material there was to add. Every technique had at LEAST five variations. So, “five elements” was at LEAST 25 techniques… If you walked in just during these segments, it would have looked like an MMA seminar!


Training with this teacher reminded me so much of my teacher. As he got to know us, he beat up my arms, he punched me (multiple times) in the spleen and the kidneys. He locked me up and threw me. All the time, laughing. He was laughing, we were laughing. We were getting the crap knocked out of us and ENJOYING IT… that is what real kung fu was about, what in my opinion it should still be about.

%d bloggers like this: